Friday, January 30, 2009

Pro-illegals eagerly anticipate white minority

Authored by Alie:

The pro-illegals often accuse the antis of racism because we want our immigration laws enforced and the borders secured. What is ironic, though, is that the pro-illegals are the ones who most often inject race into the issue.

They are the ones who express glee over the prospect of Caucasians becoming a minority in this country due to immigration.

So, I ask the question: If it is racist for some to want to maintain the current demographics of their nation, isn't it also "racist" for others to actively use immigration, especially illegal immigration to change it??

Isn't it as "racist" to suggest that a majority non-white country is more desirable than a majority "white" one??? Why all of the eager anticipation of a "less white" nation? Would they rejoice over Mexico/Latin America becoming "less brown?" I really think that pro-illegals are showing their anti-white bias when they rejoice over the diminishment of whites and, therefore, Euro-American culture, in this country.

Would it not be considered racist for whites to rejoice over the diminishment of the traditional Mestizo/indigenous population and culture of Mexico to be replaced with another and to use illegal immigration to accomplish those results?

So why the double standard?

6 comments:

Nayano said...

Although I welcome immigration form all over the world to my country (Australia) I have to agree with you.
It is not racist to want to maintain the white/other ratio.
There are other arguments that I believe have a racist basis, for example that 'non-white' immigrants are more involved in crime than us whites.
I have written about this on my blog A possie in Aussie (see http://apossieinaussie.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/clear-up-crime-make-everyone-migrate/)

patriot said...

No it isn't racist for ANY country to want to retain it's traditional society and culture. That is one of the reasons that countries limit legal immigration into their countries. It certainly isn't racist for a country to object to losing it thru ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION!!

It IS racist however for a group of ethnic people who are a minority in a country to brag about taking over and becoming the majority thru the same means.

Alie said...

Nayano, there is a difference between legal immigration and illegal immigration in regards to crime rates.

Legal immigratns are actually less prone to commit crimes than the native population in general because legal immigrants undergo criminal background checks in order to immigrate. However, due to the nature of illegal immigration, the criminal element comes in along with those whose only crime is the illegal entry itself. The Mexican border areas have become increasingly violent due to the drug traffic, cartels, etc. Also there is the issue of illegal aliens in gangs.

We have enough of our own criminals and violent offenders, and do not need to import more via illegal immigration.

Alie said...

Of course you're right, patriot. The thing is that massive migration by the poor, uneducated, and unskilled is in one direction only: into mostly white-majority countries.

We know that Japan does not allow much immigration from disparate demographic groups, neither does China.

Because this migration is only taking place to majority-white countries, the other countries are all able to maintain their cultures and traditional demographics.

However, my point was more to point out the sheer hypocrisy of the pro-illegals who rejoice at the diminishment of Euro-American population and culture in this nation, especiall through illegal immigration. This eager anticipaton of a "less white" and "more multicultural, multiracial" country is pure racism. As I said, I don't see anyone wishing for a "less Asian" China, "less Arab" Middle East, "less brown" Latin America, or "less black" Africa or furthermore, suggesting that doing so would make for more desirable countries.

I might also point out that it would not even enter the minds of those inhabitants of those lands to think of themselves as "racist" for maintaining their traditional cultures/languages/demographics. However, until those countries experience massive immigration from other lands, they will not have to deal with that factor.

It is the height of hypocrisy.

patriot said...

Alie, you sure wouldn't find Dee wishing for a less Asian China, less Arab Middle East. less Brown or Hispanic Latin America. Why? Because she is only hoping for the diminishment of whites in their country of the USA because she is racist against white people. What a hypocrite!

Liquidmicro said...

I found this statement The Nativists Are Restless from the ImmigrationProf Blog very unraveling.

There you can read Mr. Brimelow’s and Mr. Buchanan’s musings about racial dilution and the perils facing white people, and gems like this . . . :

“Diversity can be good in moderation — if what is being brought in is desirable. Most Americans don’t mind a little ethnic food, some Asian math whizzes, or a few Mariachi dancers — as long as these trends do not overwhelm the dominant culture.”


I find musings about racial dilution and the perils facing white people racist in and of itself. Yet, they don't see their own racism?? I tend to agree with Diversity can be good in moderation